The Real Thrill Of Watching Weathering With You Is In The Visuals

It’s not in my nature to deceive, but here we are. I’ve coaxed two friends into joining me in Orlando with promises of fun, free lodging, and balmy weather. Now it’s 5 a.m., 54 degrees and damp, and we’re packed into the entryway of Walt Disney World’s Hollywood Studios along with hundreds of the Disney faithful. The air reeks of sulfur and fryer oil. We’re not even close to the front of the line. It’ll be another hour before we’re let inside. Some people sleep standing up. Others apply makeup. A restive teenager bumps a woman into a stroller. The crowd is appalled. The teen begins to cry.

We’re all here for the same thing: to secure a spot on Rise of the Resistance, Disney’s newest, most advanced ride. Rise has been open just over a week, and to manage the crowds the Mouse has Imagineered a new way to stand in line: rather than wait for hours inside the park, guests sign into a “virtual queue” through an app on their phones. In theory, the queue is supposed to free up time to experience the park’s other offerings—but since visitors can’t join the queue before entering the park, they have been piling up outside the gates well before dawn; entire days’ worth of Rise passes have routinely been claimed soon after sunrise.

Why anyone would go to all this trouble has mostly to do with Rise’s billing: It’s the centerpiece attraction of Star Wars: Galaxy’s Edge, a 14-acre, $1 billion themed land nestled in Disney World’s Hollywood Studios; there’s an identical park across the country at Disneyland. Disney wants park guests to feel what it’s like to be on a distant planet in Star Wars, to drink blue milk like Luke Skywalker, and to, according to promotional material, “live [their] Star Wars story—and discover who [they] truly are in a galaxy far, far away.” In this way, Galaxy Edge is not unlike the Wizarding World of Harry Potter, at Universal Orlando, another expansive themed land based on an intellectual property with a devout following. There, visitors don wizards’ robes and wave $49 wands and drink butterbeer as they explore Hogsmeade and Diagon Alley. This June, Disney’s newest immersive themed land, the Avengers Campus, will open at Disneyland’s California Adventure park to recruit “the next generation of Super Heroes.” Collectively, these places have sprung up at a time when fans’ relationship to popular culture is perhaps its most contentious, characterized by a struggle between the people who support the beloved intellectual property and the corporations that control it. No longer is it enough to consume content, or even engage in cosplay. Today, fans yearn for a sense of ownership, a desire to directly affect what stories they are sold and how these stories are told: Release the J.J. cut! Release the Snyder cut! Remake the final season of Game of Thrones! Reshoot The Last Jedi!

Strangely, theme parks, which are controlled by the same companies whose ultimate allegiance is to the bottom line, are perhaps the only places that offer fans the illusion of control they seek, and a return to the childhood feeling that each visitor is having a sovereign experience with a mainstream franchise tailored just for them. In this way, theme parks epitomize fans’ evolving relationship to popular culture, from passive consumer to hopeful agent of change, all the while reinforcing the status quo—they make the rides, we just ride them.

In the mid-to-late aughts, theme park designers tried satiating guests by immersing them in their favorite films, largely replacing attractions’ physical sets and their charmingly stilted animatronic figures with high-def screens that play prerecorded scenes featuring the stars of whatever IP the ride was based on: Harry Potter and Ron Weasley spiraling on broomsticks mid-Quidditch match; King Kong barreling through the jungle wrestling a T. rex. But on the whole, screen-based rides can feel less like an adventure and more like a tech expo for advanced motion simulators, scurrying from one digitally rendered scene to the next. The achievement in this case is not so much immersing guests in a fictional world as it is inserting them into the movie itself. (To be fair, sometimes that’s what the people want—Skull Island: Reign of Kong at Universal’s Islands of Adventure has been well received.)

Eventually, theme parks reached screen overload. Experiencing the movie wasn’t enough; fans wanted to be inside the story. Rise of the Resistance promises this next level of immersion. It’s toned down the screens and is supposed to be the most state-of-the-art attempt at immersive storytelling yet, featuring a 15-minute “experience” stuffed with animatronic stormtroopers and a force-wielding Kylo Ren, lifelike digital space battles seamlessly integrated within the attraction’s built environment, and multiple ride systems including trackless cars, flight simulators, and a free-fall drop tower. Meanwhile, Universal has recently opened its own groundbreaking attraction, completely devoid of screens, touted as the world’s first “story coaster”: Harry Potter–themed Hagrid’s Magical Creatures Motorbike Adventure. These rides—or, to borrow the corporate parlance, experiences—represent two novel approaches in themed entertainment’s latest attempt to immerse guests inside studios’ prized IP. But just how far can they obscure the line between ride and reality? Can these latest ride systems be the remedy for fans’ seemingly unquenchable desire for immersive experiences? And if not, where will these theme parks go next?

When Disneyland first opened in 1955, the late Marty Sklar, a UCLA grad hired by Walt Disney himself to run Disneyland’s public relations, would walk the park to gauge guests’ responses. “I want to go on the Flight to the Moon, the Jungle River Cruise, and the Mark Twain,” Sklar would hear, “but I don’t want to go on any of the rides!” In this case, “rides” connoted the ramshackle roller coasters of tacky carnivals, attractions lacking a clear theme or story that sought to do little more than briefly entertain the guest. Sklar, who was eventually promoted to be principal creative executive of Walt Disney Imagineering, recalled these park walks in an impassioned 2006 memo, after a recent meeting where shareholders kept referring to Disney’s attractions as “rides.” “That word,” Sklar wrote, “is so inadequate to describe the adventure and experience of Expedition Everest, for example, that if we refer to it as a ride or ‘thrill ride’ we are diminishing an incredible attraction.” The seemingly arbitrary distinction mattered to Sklar, who’d helped Walt define “Imagineering”as “the blending of creative imagination with technical know-how.” Through an assiduous attention to detail, Imagineers—Disney’s word for everyone from artists to engineers—conceived of innovative attractions that felt like dreams come to life: soaring over London in Peter Pan’s Flight or rocketing into the cosmos on Space Mountain. The late, legendary Disney artist and creative director John Hench believed attractions such as these conveyed not escapism, but rather a “heightened reality” or “storybook realism, an essence of realism and authenticity more utopian in nature, more romanticized, more like what guests imagined it would be.” Disney didn’t just take you on a ride; it gave you an experience, and one far better than the real thing could ever be.

Disneyland and, subsequently, Disney World were responses to a theme park industry largely perceived as grimy and cheap. A Disney park, on the other hand, wasn’t about tacky concessions and a few hurl-inducing roller coasters—it was an all-encompassing environment of happiness and joy. Consumers couldn’t get enough of it. When Walt Disney died in 1966, the theme park industry was responsible for more than a third of the company’s income. Eventually, Disney’s theme park empire expanded to Orlando, where the company constructed Disney World (later composed of four separate parks, including Epcot and Animal Kingdom), and later worldwide, from Tokyo to Paris. “Disney World is nearer to what people really want than anything architects have ever given them,” architect Robert Venturi told >The New York Times Magazine in 1972. “It’s a symbolic American utopia.”

Attraction designers thrived in this environment. Unbound from the typical strictures of architecture and design, Imagineers started with an idea and worried about the logistics later. Disneyland was constructed without a single architect on staff. When building an attraction, designers would give engineers blueprints for how a set or building should look, and the engineers would be tasked with making it work without altering the design, or as The New York Times Magazine noted, “exactly the opposite of traditional architectural practice.”

In this think-tank environment, Imagineers invented audioanimatronic human characters and built Space Mountain, the first indoor roller coaster in the dark. In the case of Space Mountain, all of the design elements were in service of enhancing the attraction’s immersive qualities. Imagaineers demanded that the steel beams supporting Space Mountain protrude from the building’s exterior, so that the designers could have a smooth interior surface to project light and images. “Being inside Space Mountain is like orbiting in space,” John Hench noted in Designing Disney: Imagineering and the Art of the Show. When visitors first rode Space Mountain, they were overcome with excitement; after exiting the ride, one woman actually kissed the ground. “It came to me then that these people had not felt so alive in years as they did at that moment,” Hench wrote.

In the coming years, Imagineers continued to look toward advanced tech to develop their own ride attractions. The groundbreaking motion simulator Star Tours was adopted from sophisticated flight simulators used by the military to train pilots.

For Tower of Terror, Imagineers asked an elevator company to design a system that could pull the ride vehicle down faster than the speed of gravity.

The impulses that fueled attraction design when Disneyland first opened persist—to pinpoint the thing guests want so badly they’ll repeatedly stand in line for the chance to reexperience it, even if they can’t define what, exactly, that thing is. It’s an inexact science. But since the start, Disney was guided by imagination over practicality, and Walt’s vision had little time for functional limitations. Once, an Imagineer presented Walt with design specs, which he rejected, with little explanation other than to say, “Just do something people will like!”

Around 6:30 a.m. we enter the park and frantically log in to the virtual queue. We’re assigned to “Boarding Group 36,” which slates us to get on Rise some four hours from now. We feel crummy from exhaustion. We feel even worse after riding Millennium Falcon: Smugglers Run, a six-person flight simulator that, if you’re lucky enough to sit in one of the two pilot seats (which I was), you actually control the pitch or yaw of the Falcon (which I did, poorly). I felt bad for the people in the last row of the cockpit, who probably had trouble seeing the ride’s screen over my big head and whose only job was to occasionally press buttons on a side panel as we careened into digital walls and mountains.

Steven Diaz/Disney

When Galaxy’s Edge first opened in May, Smugglers Run was the only ride in operation at the time. Other entertainment options included workshops on designing your own droid (for $100) or constructing a lightsaber (for $200). Crowds were so much smaller than anticipated during the initial opening that Disney had to cut park employee hours; in the fall the president of Disney Parks West stepped down.

While Disney park attendance dipped in both the third and fourth fiscal quarters of the year, company CEO Bob Iger maintained during a November earnings call that both Galaxy’s Edge parks “have been far more successful than has been reported.” Iger chalked up Galaxy’s Edge’s sluggish start to “people that are just waiting for the whole thing to be open, which is fine,” adding that guest spending and Disney hotel bookings had actually both increased. Rise may not need to be the park’s lone savior, but the coming months will reveal how it affects attendance and the company’s bottom line.

Shortly before 11 a.m. our boarding group is announced. Galaxy’s Edge is nestled on the far end of Hollywood Studios, cordoned off by walls and accessible only via tunnel. The rest of the park’s noise is drowned out by the din of spaceships flying, droids welding, and snippets of a new John Williams score. Inside a courtyard just beyond the entryway to Rise, a to-scale X-Wing starship spews steam from its hull. We board a transport ship not much larger than an intraterminal airport shuttle. It shakes gently as we “take off” for space.

Soon, the transport is trapped in the tractor beam of an enemy Star Destroyer, shuddering before coming to rest in a vast hangar stuffed with rows of mannequin storm troopers and TIE fighters. Park reps dressed as enemy officers usher us into holding cells. “You appear to be wearing some kind of antennae transmitting device,” one of the guards scoffs at a person with mouse ears. “Rest assured, you’ll receive no signal in here.”

Up to this point we haven’t actually stepped on a ride vehicle; it’s been a queue creatively disguised as a dramatic interactive show. But once we’re inside our holding cell, a hole burns through the wall. It’s our allies, the Resistance, and like Luke Skywalker before them, they’re here to rescue us.

The ride vehicle we’re strapped into is “trackless,” which means its movement is programmed by computers and guided not by metal tracks, but rather sensors embedded into the floor. There is a litany of benefits for trackless ride vehicles, including how they allow designers to modify the ride’s path with relative ease. In theory, this variability enables designers to offer new experiences to guests. “When you don’t have a track, you can let them roam in a single scene for quite a while and collect more cars,” explains Eddie Sotto, who helped design the first major trackless ride, Pooh’s Hunny Hunt at Tokyo Disneyland, which debuted in 2000. “So the experience is very different and they can interact with each other.”

Matt Stroshane/Disney

Because the cars don’t move linearly through a space so much as swim in it, we have more time to appreciate the attraction’s set design, which in the case of Rise of the Resistance is elaborate. There are life-size AT-AT walkers and an audioanimatronic Kylo Ren delivering menacing threats before (SPOILER!) he’s crushed by falling debris and sucked into the vacuum of space. Digitally rendered stormtroopers fire blasters that explode on impact with the ride’s physical sets, sending sparks flying from the walls and ceiling. Our ride vehicle stops and starts and spins and flies in reverse, but it’s a gentle, slippery ride. The designers have toggled between animatronics and 3-D imagery with such deftness that I can’t easily distinguish between them. At one point, what appears to be an actual red lightsaber stabs through the ceiling above us. The most impressive sequence involves our car doing a Frogger-like dance as we race to the end of a corridor dodging recoiling laser cannons. The cannons fire into a congested (and convincing!) space battle, which plays out on screens rooted in the Star Destroyer’s windows to our right. When it comes time to “escape” the Star Destroyer, our trackless transport locks into a motion simulator. But this simulator doesn’t just rock and sway like the ones at the mall. It’s attached to another ride system, an elevator that drops suddenly to mimic the sensation of plummeting out of the Destroyer’s docking bay back to our home planet. In effect, we’ve just ridden three rides in one.

No attraction is worth waking up at 3:30 a.m. to ride, but Rise is sensational. Its greatest accomplishment is how it situates the guest inside a cohesive story—from queue to exit, the narrative is clear (escape planet, get taken hostage by enemy, escape enemy, return home). While many attractions use the narrative premise of the guest completing a mission, oftentimes the story is subservient to either the ride’s thrills (here comes the big drop!) or a task the guest must complete that has no actual influence on the story (on one of my favorite rides, Men in Black Alien Attack, you fire a gun, but even if you fail to hit a single alien the outcome is the same). On Rise, the guest doesn’t assume an “active” role—you just sit in the transport—but your presence is essential to the story, and the obsessively detailed environment gives the impression that the story is happening to you.

The guiding spirit behind Galaxy’s Edge is Scott Trowbridge. Before being recruited by Disney, Trowbridge was instrumental in the conception and planning of Universal’s The Wizarding World of Harry Potter, and he’s one of the pioneers in designing indoor attractions that combine roller-coaster mechanics with computer-generated imagery. “Traditionally, theme park attractions have had to make a choice: roller coaster thrill ride or an immersive dark ride,” Trowbridge told The New York Times in 2004 at the premiere of one of his hybrid dark rides at Universal Orlando, Revenge of the Mummy. “We have been striving to find a way to put together the best of both worlds in one experience.”

Until Rise, the attraction that best combined all this tech was The Amazing Adventures of Spider-Man, at Universal’s Islands of Adventure, which Trowbridge designed alongside Phil Bloom (nicknamed “The Ride Guru”) and Universal Parks & Resorts creative executive Thierry Coup. Opened in May 1999, the Spider-Man ride has guests play the role of news reporters covering Spider-Man’s attempt to stop supervillains who want to demolish the Statue of Liberty. Spider-Man became the first thrill ride to ever coordinate a ride vehicle’s movements with 3-D projected images, a process called “squinching.” This allowed the ride vehicle to move frantically and suddenly without compromising the integrity of the three-dimensional images being displayed to the viewer (like, say, when you take off your 3-D glasses at a movie and the screen goes fuzzy). Spider-Man would earn the Golden Ticket Award for best “dark ride” by Amusement Today 12 years in a row before being supplanted by Harry Potter and the Forbidden Journey (another Trowbridge attraction). “The idea was to have the lines blurred on what was real and what was virtual so that you were really immersed in it,” Anne Militello, who was named Themed Lighting Designer of the Year by Lighting Dimensions International for her work on Spider-Man, told me in the fall. “So you really did feel like you were in hard scenery all the time and you were in that world.”

Kent Phillips/Disney

Spider-Man’s success, coupled with developments in 3-D and virtual reality technology, sparked a wave of attractions incorporating—if not outright relying on—screens to render immersive environments for guests: Revenge of the Mummy, Avatar Flight of Passage, Harry Potter and the Forbidden Journey, Fast & Furious–Supercharged, Transformers: The Ride. Screen tech affords numerous benefits. For one, designers can depict high-quality environments faster than they can build them, and in relatively little space; it’s also cheaper than constructing vast physical sets. “To build out a full scenery and sets and everything at the level in which we’re building it now is sometimes cost-prohibitive,” Jason McManus, senior art director for the experiential design company Thinkwell, told me. And screen-based attractions are more modular than physical environments. “It’s far more adaptable,” McManus said. “Whereas an animatronic you’re stuck with that figure for years and years.”

With this convenience comes a trade-off, as theme parks—at least Universal, and to a lesser degree Disney—have now reached screen overload. In his experience design courses at CalArts, McManus teaches his students about the limits to which people can be deceived by digital technology. “Humans are pretty good at deciphering what’s real and fake,” McManus said. “We went really far in one direction and now we’re realizing that our guests actually want to see physical environments. We’re getting more selective where we use some of the screens, as opposed to plastering a screen everywhere and calling it a day.” McManus cites Ratatouille: L’Aventure Totalement Toquée de Rémy (“Remy’s Totally Zany Adventure”) at Disneyland Paris, in which guests assume the perspective of a rat scurrying through a kitchen, and Scott Trowbridge’s Harry Potter and the Forbidden Journey, which approximates the sensation of flying above Hogwarts, as prime examples of rides that incorporate screens without wholly depending on them to render an environment.

>“Humans are pretty good at deciphering what’s real and fake. We went really far in one direction and now we’re realizing that our guests actually want to see physical environments.” —Jason McManus, Thinkwell senior art director

Screen-based rides largely steer the viewers’ attention in one direction, which can limit one of the draws of going to a theme park—to have a shared social experience. Open physical environments, on the other hand, invite riders to look around, not only at the sets and animatronics, but at other riders’ reactions, too. In this way, rides rooted in the built environment tend to remind the guest that they are, in fact, on a ride (the more time you have to look around, the more opportunities there are to spot design flaws), rather than escaping into a distant virtual world. But that may not be such a bad thing. Hench famously rejected the notion that the Disney parks offered escapism, but rather a reassurance that there was hope for the real world to be safe and secure: “Disneyland is a public place where you can talk to a stranger and let your children play without fear. We are proof that a public place can be clean and things can work. We reassure people that the world can be OK!” The attraction designers with whom I spoke, meanwhile, all mentioned the value of having a shared experience, a social component like going to a movie theater on opening night rather than waiting to watch something on Netflix at home alone. There is a downside to participating in the kind of bizarre frenzy that theme parks inspire: As John Jeremiah Sullivan argues, you “surrender to something enormous” and teeter on “that knife edge between joy and disappointment.” But it’s also that risk of disappointment that makes any interminable wait for an attraction both exhilarating—will it live up to the hype?—and gratifying. To have survived the wait is to have achieved a feat of endurance. But enduring all that wait only to plop down in a glorified motion simulator feels somehow dissatisfying, perhaps because there’s no sense of linear progression (you are, after all, sitting in a confined box). The stakes feel lower, too. In his book, Michael Eisner recalls how Imagineering executive Mickey Steinberg once told him, “In the hotel business we concentrate on one icon—the lobby,” to which Eisner added, “At Disney, everything is a lobby.” A largely digitally rendered experience feels less tangible—because it is—and therefore less stimulating for the guest to evaluate as they go through the ride. It’s an almost purely passive experience.

Where Galaxy’s Edge attempts to extend the current lore of Star Wars (it’s set on a planet not even referenced in the Star Wars universe), The Wizarding World doubles down on the fictional worlds already established in Harry Potter: Guests can eat where Harry Potter ate, go to the shop where he bought his wand, even walk through the Hogwarts castle where he went to school.

Universal’s The Wizarding World of Harry Potter is split into two themed lands: the wizards’ village of Hogsmeade, and Diagon Alley, the hidden wizard commercial center in London. Hagrid’s Magical Creatures Motorbike Adventure, Universal’s latest showcase attraction, has a discreet entrance on the outskirts of Hogsmeade, next to the Forbidden Forest, which in the books and movies is off limits to Hogwarts students.

“That’s why you don’t see a big, splashy marquee,” Elaine Hinds, who oversaw the development of Hagrid’s, tells me when we meet out front of the ride. “Because it wouldn’t be that way.”

There’s a 90-minute wait for Hagrid’s; on the day it opened, there were reports of up to 10-hour waits. As Hinds guides me through the ride’s exit, we pass a young boy who hollers, “That’s the best roller coaster I’ve ever been on!” We slip through a dark hallway and cut to the front of the line, at which point Hinds whispers to the attendants, who arrange for us to sit in the front cars.

Universal Orlando

Hagrid’s ride vehicle is modeled after the eponymous character’s sidecar motorcycle, which presented special engineering challenges; the two riders sit at considerably different heights and therefore experience varying degrees of force on the ride’s sharp turns and sudden drops. The ride contains seven launches, which accelerate the vehicle from a standstill to anywhere from 35 to 50 mph, and are supposed to model the feeling of riding a real motorcycle, revving up and slowing down and banking sharply; Hagrid’s has the most roller coaster launches in the world. Once we take off, we weave through trees and skim ponds at a 45-degree angle that feels closer to 90. The speed and wind cause actual tears to stream down my face.

After the ride I feel woozy, but Hinds tells me we’re getting right back on, this time in the very last row. She wants to illustrate the multiple experiences you can have on the attraction: Where the front apparently feels more like a thrill ride, in back, she says, you get a better sense of the attraction’s “show,” namely its hulking animatronic beasts. This time I take the sidecar. Now that I’m not clutching the handlebars and screaming, I can appreciate how Hagrid’s feels old-school, but isn’t rickety.

At a glance, Hagrid’s doesn’t appear to be terribly innovative, not much different from a traditional roller coaster guided by a winding metal track. But in some ways it’s a radical departure from the screen-heavy attractions of recent past, which have been especially prevalent at the Universal parks. There’s not a 3-D screen in sight on Hagrid’s, just animatronics and steel and fog machines. “One of the questions I get all the time is, ‘Is it a dark ride? Is it 3-D?’” Hinds says. “Every time. Every time. Nope! It’s a classic roller coaster. If you took all the thematic away, it’s a cool coaster. But being able to take that really cool coaster and then embed it into this, thematically, is what sets it apart.” Universal doesn’t disclose financials for its attractions, but Hagrid’s has been a clear success among fans, whose only major complaint has been the ride’s erratic schedule: In its first six months, Hagrid’s was closed frequently for repairs, and had inconsistent run times throughout the days when it was open.

Universal Orlando

Hinds can’t say whether there’s been consumer fatigue with screen-based rides. She believes a ride’s appeal ultimately hinges on individual preference. “I mean, there are roller coaster junkies, right?” she says. “I’m a roller coaster junkie. But then there are people who are dark-ride junkies, you know, and they love the 3-D and they love that whole piece of it.” Ultimately, the decision to forgo 3-D rides on Hagrid’s came down to notions of narrative. “Certain stories demand certain things,” Hinds says. “When you’re looking at something like Transformers, you expect a certain level of technology, right? You as a consumer have a certain expectation of what that experience will be. But when you think about Harry Potter, you don’t really think about technology. You think about magic.” While the means are new and revolutionary, the approach behind Hagrid’s is steeped in long-held philosophies about amusement rides—one of “Mickey’s Ten Commandments,” written by Marty Sklar for Disney’s Imagineers, is: “Avoid contradictions—maintain identity: Details in design or content that contradict one another confuse an audience about your story or the time period it takes place in.”

At Thinkwell, Jason McManus and his colleagues try to anticipate what the next development in themed entertainment will be. “The pendulum has kind of arrived at the certain point now,” McManus told me. “What’s happening in the next 10 years, what are the new technologies and things that will augment that experience for guests in the future?”

According to McManus, the next step is augmented reality. Rather than being confined to a headset like in virtual reality, in augmented reality guests move through a physical environment that is then enhanced with digital images and objects. In 10 years or so, McManus estimates that only 30 percent of an attraction’s space will be composed of physical objects. The rest will be digital. “But unlike attractions right now where there’s scenery and then it cuts off and there’s a screen, you won’t be able to tell what the beginning and end of that blend is. We could go on and on with water effects and fire effects and magic and all these things that are believable because your brain can’t tell the difference between what’s actually there and what’s not.”

>“Unlike attractions right now where there’s scenery and then it cuts off and there’s a screen, [in the future] you won’t be able to tell what the beginning and end of that blend is.” —McManus

Rick Rothschild, who retired from Walt Disney Imagineering after 30 years as a creative executive and show director and has since founded his own company, FAR Out! Creative Direction, told me he’s excited about the possibilities of augmented reality. But Rothschild remembers standing near the exit to the The ExtraTERRORestrial Alien Encounter when it first opened at Disney World in 1995, listening to guests’ reactions. He was surprised when he heard guests refer to the attraction as a “ride,” even though the attraction never moved and merely involved sitting in a stationary seat and watching an animatronic production. What was it, he wondered, that prompted people to feel as though they had been on a ride when they hadn’t moved? Ultimately, Rothschild concluded that it was the attraction’s story that made it so immersive. Guests felt that they were “physically involved” in the story, that they had gone on a literal “emotional ride.”

“I think we as humans like to be told a good story, just like we as humans like to hear a great piece of music or hear a great lyric in a great song,” Rothschild said. “And, quite honestly, I think, if it’s really, really great and it really, really hits the right chords for us as an audience member, we’ll rewatch it, we’ll relisten to it. We enjoy hearing that story over and over again, because it’s so much fun to lose yourself in that story.”

But when it comes to Galaxy’s Edge—and, to some degree, The Wizarding World, for that matter—one can’t help but wonder just how viable these stories will be in the long term; The ExtraTERRORestrial Alien Encounter was replaced in less than 10 years by a Lilo & Stitch ride.

Will people be passionate enough about these franchises a decade from now to not just ride and visit these attractions, but feel compelled to reride them year after year? The announcement for Disney’s Avengers Campus came as the latest Star Wars movie, The Rise of Skywalker, was receiving mixed reviews and furthering polarizing its fan base. Strangely, Galaxy’s Edge functions as a doubling down of sorts on the new franchise: It’s largely focused on characters and story lines from the newest trilogy, with little reference to the original movies. It’s even set on a planet not referenced in any of the movies. “We wanted to build new Star Wars stories, new Star Wars destinations, but this time you could be in that story that required us to go to a new place,” Trowbridge told the> Orlando Sentinel a few years back. “It’s a new planet. It’s a new place. It’s this remote frontier outpost.”

It’s unclear whether a themed land can handle the burden of this kind of storytelling. After all, is this a version of Star Wars that fans want to be immersed in? The box office results inspire doubt. Do fans want to develop a new association with Batuu, or simply walk around well-worn settings like Tatooine or Hoth or the forest moon of Endor? It may be that Disney has taken its immersive concept one step too far, and that, ultimately, visitors are looking for a sprinkling of theme, rather than full-blown, intricate immersion. My favorite attraction at any of the parks is The Twilight Zone Tower of Terror, and I’ve never seen an episode of The Twilight Zone in my life. For the time being, Galaxy’s Edge is set in a specific timeline in the Star Wars canon, between The Last Jedi and The Rise of Skywalker, which presents some limitations on what characters or events can be depicted in the land—no Darth Vader or Obi-Wan Kenobi or Han Solo or Luke Skywalker (except as a Force ghost, perhaps?). There are rumors that Disney might ease up on these narrative constraints, especially with the popularity of The Mandalorian, which currently takes place some 25 years before the sequel trilogy, but for now, Disney has tethered its newest park to a story that was much more popular and beloved before construction was completed.

“I don’t think it’s predictable to say, number one, that any particular technology is the panacea of the future—it is a piece of the future,” Rothschild told me. “And I also don’t think you can predict what, five years from now, the themed entertainment industry is going to look like relative to what new technologies it’s discovered that it’s begun to take advantage of.”

Disney is currently developing its own “story coaster” (their term is “storytelling coaster”), Guardians of the Galaxy: Cosmic Rewind. Like Hagrid’s, Cosmic Rewind will “launch” visitors. Its added flourish is ride vehicles that can fully rotate, in theory enhancing the ride’s narrative much like Rise’s trackless cars. “Instead of whizzing by the action,” Disney says, “the system will fully immerse you in the attraction’s story from the minute you take off.” Cosmic Rewind will open at Epcot in 2021, which will mark 50 years of Walt Disney World—50 years of trying to give the guest something they’ve never had before.

After Walt Disney died in 1966, Disneyland’s Pirates of the Caribbean became, according to Marty Sklar, “the most valuable single property ever created in the theme park business.” Like Rise of the Resistance, Pirates is a “dark ride” that strives for immersion through painstakingly detailed animatronic characters, precise lighting, and some good faith on the guests’ part. The attraction is so dense with characters and set pieces that the animator assigned to write the ride’s script initially feared they’d “overwritten” the dialog. “Think of it this way,” Walt assured the animator. “It’s like a cocktail party: You hear bits and pieces of conversation, and you get the idea of what’s going on. Our boat ride is even better; if you want to hear the rest of the conversation, come back for another ride!”

I’m reminded of this “cocktail party” philosophy at the end of my week in Orlando. On the way to the airport, my Lyft driver tells me about a time he and his wife waited two hours one evening to ride Hagrid’s Magical Creatures Motorbike Adventure. If the park weren’t about to close, he says, he would have gladly waited another two hours again. I’ve heard from others, too, that Hagrid’s is a totally different experience at night, a different cocktail party. When I tell my driver I rode Hagrid’s twice, but only during the day, he shakes his head and cuts me off. I have to go back again at night, he insists—no matter the wait.

Hal Sundt is a writer from Minnesota. His work has appeared or is forthcoming in The New York Times Magazine, Wired, and The Bitter Southerner. This is his first story for The Ringer.

The Quest for the Best Amusement Park Is Ever-Changing and Never-Ending
Getting the Most From Li-ion Batteries
Go off-grid: 30 of the world's most remote hotels to unplug and recharge
The best Android games 2020
'The Suicide of Rachel Foster' Review: An Addictive Video Game Page-Turner
The Last of Us 2 release date, trailers, news and rumors
Walking with the Big Five in a magical world of wildflowers
25 of the best things to do in Canada
Would you pay $3,000 for a house plant? Why monstera collectors are investing in these delicate darlings of Instagram
6 reasons why ‘6 Underground’ is the best, worst movie on Netflix